what have researchers found to be the most common biological cause of paraphilias?
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Nov; 24(11): 994–1003.
Encephalon structure alterations in depression: Psychoradiological evidence
Fei‐Fei Zhang
1 Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Red china,
Wei Peng
1 Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, West Cathay Hospital of Sichuan Academy, Chengdu, Prc,
John A. Sweeney
i Huaxi MR Inquiry Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Due west China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's republic of china,
2 Section of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA,
Zhi‐Yun Jia
ane Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Westward China Hospital of Sichuan Academy, Chengdu, China,
3 Section of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Mainland china,
Qi‐Yong Gong
1 Huaxi MR Inquiry Centre (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, W Communist china Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,
iv Department of Psychology, Schoolhouse of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,
Received 2017 Nov xxx; Revised 2018 February 7; Accustomed 2018 Feb 8.
Summary
Depression is the leading cause of disability around the earth, but little is known about its pathology. Currently, the diagnosis of depression is made based on clinical manifestations, with little objective evidence. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to investigate the pathological changes in brain anatomy associated with this disorder. MRI can place structural alterations in depressive patients in vivo, which could make considerable contributions to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Numerous studies that focused on gray and white matter have found pregnant brain region alterations in major depressive disorder patients, such as in the frontal lobe, hippocampus, temporal lobe, thalamus, striatum, and amygdala. The results are inconsistent and controversial considering of the different demographic and clinical characteristics. However, some regions overlapped; thus, we think that there may exist a "hub" in MDD and that an impairment in these regions contributes to disease severity. Encephalon connections contain both structural connections and functional connections, which reflect affliction from a different view and support that MDD may be caused by the interaction of multiple brain regions. According to previous reports, significant circuits include the frontal‐subcortical excursion, the suicide circuit, and the reward circuit. As has been recognized, the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder is complex and changeable. The electric current review focuses on the pregnant alterations in the grey and white thing of patients with the depressive disorder to generate a ameliorate understanding of the circuits. Moreover, identifying the nuances of depressive disorder and finding a biomarker will make a significant contribution to the guidance of clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Keywords: Psychoradiology, diffusion MRI; magnetic resonance imaging; major depressive disorder; structure MRI
i. INTRODUCTION
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by persistent low mood, often accompanied by cognitive dysfunction, physical symptoms, and impaired social function.1 According to the Earth Wellness Arrangement'southward statistics, more than 300 million people worldwide suffer from depression. More severely, low can cause suicide, and almost 800 000 people die every twenty-four hours due to suicide. According to statistics from 2015,ii suicide is the second leading crusade of death amongst people xv‐29 years of age, resulting in vast economic and social burdens. Based on epidemiological studies, more than 30% of patients with depression endure from ineffective antidepressant treatments, and their lifetime prevalence rate is approximately xvi.2%.3 Currently, the diagnosis of MDD relies on patients' reporting and behavioral assessments. Little is known about its precise neurobiological biomarkers. Neuroimaging studies have the advantage of beingness noninvasive and repeatable and might provide precise bear witness to clinics for more successful individualized therapies.
In recent years, neuroimaging methods, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been used in many studies to identify disorder‐related patterns of the brain changes associated with MDD. The MRI scan sequences that are commonly used past researchers include high‐resolution structural imaging (3D‐T1), which depicts gray affair thickness in volume and encephalon morphology; diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which depicts the microstructure of the white matter; and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which depicts the neuronal activity in target brain regions. Previous studies based on MRI institute that several brain regions are significantly dumb in MDD patients. Several regional gray thing changes have been identified in the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, thalamus, caudate, pallidum, putamen, and temporal lobes (eg, the hippocampus and amygdala)iv, 5, vi past anatomical MRI studies. DTI studies accept shown white affair alterations, such as decreased partial anisotropy (FA) in the cingulum,7 hippocampus, parietal regions,eight inferior temporal gyrus, and superior frontal gyrus. These findings were confirmed by a recent meta‐assay.9 In addition, abnormal brain activity was establish in the prefrontal cortex,ten occipital lobe,11 temporal gray, caudate,12 and putamen.13 Different encephalon regions have connections with each other and ultimately form complex brain networks. A hub is a region that is highly continued and highly central that plays a office in global data integration14 (Figurei). The impairment of hub nodes or their connections may be a leading cause of disease, such as MDD. Structural connections between cortical and subcortical areas compose several circuits, such as the frontal‐subcortical circuit,15 basal ganglic‐thalamic‐cortical excursion,16 prefrontal hippocampus circuit,17 the limbic‐cortical‐striatal‐thalamic‐cortical circuit,18 and the limbic‐cortical‐striatal‐pallidal‐thalamic19 circuit. The virtually common functional connection in MDD patients is the cortical‐subcortical excursion.xx According to previous findings, the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, thalamus, putamen, and hippocampus are considered hubs in these circuits.14, 21, 22
Structural network hubs of the homo encephalon. Structural brain hubs were identified by diffusion tensor imaging, and the nodes normalized to an intramodular degree higher than one were defined as hubs.14, 21 ACG, inductive cingulate and paracingulate gyri; CAL, calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex; HIP, hippocampus; INS, insula; L, left; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; MTG, eye temporal gyrus; PCUN, precuneus; PUT, putamen; R, right; SOG, superior occipital gyrus; SPG, superior parietal gyrus; SFGdor, dorsolateral part of the superior frontal gyrus; SFGmed, medial role of the superior frontal gyrus; THA, thalamus
In the nowadays review, significant structural changes in brain regions and circuits involved in MDD are reviewed, and time to come inquiry directions in this field are outlined. This commodity focuses on the imaging findings of MDD to explore the findings of neuroimaging, which is helpful for differential diagnosis and accurate medicine.
2. Meaning STRUCTURAL BRAIN ALTERATIONS IN MDD
2.1. Frontal lobe
According to previous reports, the change in the volume of frontal regions has been considered to exist the most common region to manifest anatomic abnormalities in MDD. Important prefrontal lesions include those of Brodmann area 24 (a office of the inductive cingulate cortex), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), middle prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and other areas of the prefrontal cortex.8, 23, 24, 25, 26 The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has an anatomical connexion with dorsal neocortical and ventral paralimbic regions and plays a role in cognitive processes and mood regulation.27 The right anterior cingulate cortex was reported to have a decreased magnetization transfer ratio in patients with treatment‐refractory MDD relative to salubrious controls,28 which increased subsequently electroconvulsive therapy.29 Previous studies have also plant that prefrontal areas undergo a meaning reduction in thickness,4, 30, 31, 32 and these changes are thought to be associated with poor clinical outcomes.33 A negative correlation was observed between the Montgomery‐Asberg Low Rating Scale score and cortical thickness in the ACC.34 Information technology has been indicated that the thicker right caudal ACC is associated with greater symptom comeback across follow‐ups. According to an fMRI study, the ACC has increased functional correlations with the DLPFC and the amygdala35 in MDD patients, suggesting that the ACC is more similar to a bridge between the DLPFC and the amygdala and plays a critical function in attending and emotion. The OFC is involved in inhibiting background‐contained, redundant, or uncomfortable neural activity, feelings, and behaviors and as well plays a crucial part in emotional/motivational management and decision making.36 It has been reported that the thickness of the correct medial orbital cortex in MDD patients is thinner than that in healthy controls,37 and during treatment, increased cortical thickness was establish in the OFC in MDD patients. Functional MRI results constitute reduced encephalon activeness in the bilateral OFC.38 Structural and functional changes in the OFC may contribute to the reduced inhibition of negative stimuli in depressive patients. The volume of grayness matter in the left center frontal gyrus was institute to be decreased in untreated depressive patients2 and to increase after drug treatment.39 These changes are associated with emotional bias, aloofness, and loss of motivation.v The fibers in the medial frontal cortex are function of the default‐fashion network40 and play an essential role in the execution of long‐term mental plans from immediate environmental or internal demands.41 A report institute a reduction in both the heart frontal cortex and the connection of the corpus callosum in treatment‐refractory MDD.42 Fibers extending through the bilateral medial frontal lobe to the anterior corpus callosum and passing fibers connecting the medial frontal lobe to the amygdala via the uncinate fasciculus during stimulation of the "best" contacts have been deemed to exist the switch in MDD.43 The DLPFC plays an essential role in emotional, motivational, attentional, and executive functions.44 Grayness matter volume reductions have as well been plant in the DLPFC in MDD patients compared to healthy controls.two Brain activeness in the DLPFC was likewise establish to be decreased13 and could be increased to the boilerplate level later antidepressant treatment.ii Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left DLPFC induces morphological increases in the left ACC and the middle frontal OFC,45 indicating that the DLPFC has connections with the ACC and the OFC.
two.2. Thalamus
The thalamus is considered a complicated sensory information node that controls emotion, memory, and arousal.46 Dysfunction and structural disruptions in the thalamus tin pb to an amnestic syndrome due to impairments in recall and recognition.47 The thalamus is structured as several anatomical parts. The subthalamic nuclei have fibers from the pallidum and motor cortex and send out fibers to the substantia nigra. The lateral dorsal thalamic nucleus sends out fibers to the parietal lobe, and the ventral lateral thalamic nucleus has connections with the cerebellum and the brainstem. Pregnant volume reductions and changes in shape have been observed in the left thalamus48 of patients with MDD. Based on a shape assay of the vertex, the dorsal attribute of the left thalamus was constitute to be negatively correlated with the severity of low (Hamilton Low Rating Scale).48 A probabilistic tractography study reported that the areas with shape deformities in the bilateral putamen and left thalamus had connections with the frontal and temporal lobes.48 The gray matter book of the correct thalamus was also found to be reduced in MDD patients,42, 49 and this finding was confirmed by a recent meta‐analysis.50 As some studies take shown, drugs and astute attacks can bear upon the book of the thalamus, which may propose a state‐dependent mode of low.5 Equally the anterior thalamic nuclei class a key region involved in emotional regulation,48, 51 the decreased FA in these regions in MDD might contribute to emotional deregulation and could exist a target for diagnostic assessments and therapies.52, 53
2.3. Striatum
The striatum is an of import part of basal ganglia.54 A big number of neuroimaging studies take reported significant changes in the striatum of MDD patients. Decreased gray matter intensity in the ventral striatum55 was also reported in MDD patients who committed suicide. Disruptions in striatal output may atomic number 82 to impulsive and suicidal beliefs.56 Functional magnetic resonance imaging has shown that striatal activity was reduced in reward organisation defects,57 and decreased reward network connections were establish to be associated with depression severity.58 These findings advise that abnormal striatal activeness plays an essential role in disease progression. The striatum contains the putamen, the caudate, and the ventral striatum.47 The results of previous studies accept shown that compared with a control group, the book of the bilateral putamen decreased significantly in MDD patients.48 In addition, structural alterations in the putamen may be related to the result of drugs59 and the age of onset in MDD. According to previous results, the putamen plays a central role in mood, cognitive processes, motivation, and regulation of motility.60 The putamen is a component of the hate circuit61 and has connections with the OFC and the ACC.62 Increased functional activity in the putamen has been reported,xiii which may atomic number 82 to a weakening of the ability to control emotions and a low threshold of provoking feelings of hatred toward oneself or others. The caudate nucleus is a critical component of the reward organization in the brain and is often associated with the treatment of reward stimuli.63 It has been reported that the volume of the caudate is reduced in MDD patients64 and that it has a negative correlation with illness severity. Reduced activity was besides reported in the caudate57 in patients with MDD. Dysfunction of the caudate nucleus may pb to a disruption in dopaminergic signaling, as this region receives inputs from the ventral tegmental dopaminergic neurons.65 Therefore, the decrease in the gray affair density in the correct caudate nucleus66 of MDD patients can explain the cadre features of depression or even the lack of responsiveness to positive stimuli or advantage constituents in patients with MDD.
ii.4. Parietal lobe
The parietal lobe is involved in the organization, decision making, and predictions of rewards during conditioning that evaluates outcomes for future response choices that are uncertain.67 This region is also related to emotional processing and cerebral changes and is role of the default‐mode network. Increased cortical thickness has been noted in the left inferior parietal gyrus68 in MDD patients compared to healthy controls, and morphometric correlation analysis found a positive caudate‐cortical connection in the bilateral superior parietal lobe.68 The superior parietal lobe is role of the default‐mode network. The default‐mode network has a functional connexion with the caudate via dopaminergic projections. Striatal dopaminergic circuits may regulate noesis and emotion past modulating the DMN in MDD.68 Recently, our grouping observed a lower magnetization transfer ratio in the left superior parietal lobule in MDD patients than that in healthy controls and increased grayness matter volume in the right postcentral gyrus in MDD patients compared to good for you controls.69 Increased thickness and correlations may betoken compensatory mechanisms associated with inflammation or other aspects of the pathophysiology of depression. The regional homogeneity value was found to exist increased in the right inferior parietal lobule70 and in the right frontoparietal region11 in depressive patients. The calculation of the regional homogeneity value depends on the regional cerebral claret menses. A task positron emission tomography report found that the blood catamenia in the parietal lobe would increase along with data complexity and subtract when the subjects adopted the information.71 This finding indicated that an increased regional homogeneity value of the parietal lobe may lead to impairments in data reception and in learning.
2.v. Hippocampus
The hippocampus is associated with memory recall and the rules of reward.72 Previous studies have shown that the hippocampus is smaller in depressed patients than in salubrious controls,73 and this finding has been confirmed by meta‐analyses.74, 75 In that location is evidence that stress via the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis can result in elevated glucocorticoid levels in patients with MDD and tin act on the glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus.76 Thus, hippocampal atrophy occurs as a outcome.77 Antidepressant handling enquiry78 and a longitudinal study of electroconvulsive therapy found an increased greyness affair volume in the hippocampus in MDD patients afterwards treatment,29, 79 suggesting that the increased hippocampal volume was associated with clinical improvement. A study reported that people with depression who are over forty years of age, or those with astringent or multiple episodes, were more probable to have a modest hippocampus.fourscore Additionally, other studies have plant that a small hippocampus may exist associated with illness elapsing in MDD.81 Co-ordinate to an fMRI study, decreased brain activity in the hippocampus was reported82 in depressive patients. Reduced gray matter volume and reduced functional activeness in the hippocampus would lead to negative emotion and the inability of cognitive processing in depressive patients.
3. IMPAIRED CIRCUITS IN MDD
3.1. Prefrontal‐subcortical excursion
The striatum, thalamus, and prefrontal cortex constitute the prefrontal‐subcortical circuit,47 which is involved in emotional and cognitive processing and is considered to exist a potential pathophysiological target in MDD.83 The structural connectivity of the prefrontal‐subcortical circuit begins at the prefrontal cortex. The striatum receives data from the PFC and outputs the data to the globus pallidus and the substantial nigra. All data is then projected through the thalamus to the prefrontal cortex. The thalamus is the final neuronal link back to the cortex, making the circuit a airtight loop. This review mainly introduces 3 prefrontal circuits (Effigy2), which were originally described past Alexander.84 In each excursion, two pathways have mainly been reported (Figure3): i direct pathway goes from the striatum to the pallidum, and the other pathway projects from the striatum to the pallidum, then to the subthalamic nucleus, and back to the pallidum.85 Bones research has constitute that gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate participate in these two pathways.83 Directly, the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus arm-twist excitement and project to the striatum. The striatum transmits information through GABAergic neurons that project to the globus pallidus. Indirectly, the subthalamic nucleus receives data from the cortex and the globus pallidus via GABAergic neurons and then outputs through glutamatergic neurons to the globus pallidus. Both the direct and indirect pathways enter the thalamus through gamma fibers, but impairments in these two pathways could lead to differential pathology. Harm to the direct pathway results in abnormal suppression of the thalamus. In dissimilarity, dysfunction in the indirect pathway leads to disinhibition and thalamic hyperactivity.47
Prefrontal excursion. The striatum, thalamus, and prefrontal cortex constitute the prefrontal‐ subcortical excursion (A). The dorsolateral prefrontal circuit (B) originates in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which projects to the dorsolateral caudate. And so, fibers track through the directly or indirect pathway to the lateral dorsomedial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra. The globus pallidus and the substantia nigra then projection to the ventral anterior and medial dorsal thalamus.86 The thalamus collects all the information and sends it back to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; the orbitofrontal prefrontal circuit (C) originates in the inferolateral prefrontal cortex. The OFC fibers project to the ventromedial caudate. Then, the caudate outputs fibers through the direct and indirect pathways to the medial dorsomedial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra. The pallidum and the substantia nigra take connections with the ventral anterior and medial dorsal thalamic nuclei. All information volition ultimately return to the orbitofrontal cortex; the anterior cingulate‐prefrontal excursion (D) begins in the ACC, and the fibers project to the ventral striatum and the substantia nigra. The striatum outputs to the medial dorsal thalamus. Finally, the thalamus sends all the information dorsum to the ACC. ACC, inductive cingulate cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; GPs, globus pallidus; mid, center; OFC, orbitofrontal prefrontal cortex; SN, substantia nigra; THA, thalamus
Two pathways from the caudate to the thalamus. The prefrontal‐subcortical excursion originates from the prefrontal cortex and outputs fibers projecting to the striatum. Directly, the striatum transmits information through GABAergic neurons and projects to the globus pallidus. Indirectly, the striatum projects to the globus pallidus. The subthalamic nucleus receives information from the cortex via glutamatergic neurons and from the globus pallidus via GABAergic neurons, which then output through glutamatergic neurons to the globus pallidus. All information ultimately returns to the prefrontal cortex. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; GABA, gamma‐aminobutyric acid; Glu, glutamatergic; GPs, globus pallidum; OFC, orbitofrontal prefrontal cortex; SN, substantia nigra; THA, thalamus
3.one.1. The dorsolateral prefrontal circuit
The dorsolateral prefrontal circuit originates from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA seed based 9 and BA ten) and connects to the dorsolateral caudate. The caudate outputs to the lateral dorsomedial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra through the directly or indirect pathway. The pallidum and substantia nigra have connections with the ventral anterior and medial dorsal thalamus.86 Finally, all messages are returned through the thalamus to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. A functional connectivity analysis reported coactivity in the bilateral DLPFC and the dorsal caudate.54 The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the caudate nucleus are unable to preserve recognition. According to a previous fMRI report, decreased activity in the caudate and increased activity in Brodmann area 10 were reported during reward apprehension57 in patients with MDD. These findings suggested that patients with depression have the intention of inducing pleasurable emotions. Thus, MDD patients with impaired dorsolateral prefrontal circuits may showroom executive dysfunction.47
three.1.2. The orbitofrontal prefrontal circuit
The orbitofrontal prefrontal circuit starts at the inferolateral prefrontal cortex (BA ten and BA xi).87 The OFC sends fibers to the ventromedial caudate. Then, the caudate outputs through the direct and indirect pathways to the medial dorsomedial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra. The medial dorsal thalamic nucleus receives input from the pallidum and the substantia nigra and outputs to the OFC. All the data will ultimately exist sent to the orbitofrontal cortex. Functional seed‐based studies of the OFC found coactivity with these limbic regions.88 Heavy connections of the orbitofrontal gyrus with other cortical and subcortical regions, such as the parahippocampal gyrus, the ACC, and the posterior cingulate cortex,89 take been reported. A functional MRI study showed that a decrease in the OFC circuit connections was associated with unexpected reward receipt tasks90 and pleasant stimuli91 in MDD patients. The causal relationship betwixt the OFC and the ACC is positively correlated with the severity of low.twenty In conclusion, the orbitofrontal circuit may be negatively related to the severity of depression and the source of negative thinking.92
3.ane.3. The anterior cingulate‐prefrontal circuit
The inductive cingulate‐prefrontal circuit begins in the anterior cingulate cortex (BA 24). The ACC outputs messages to the ventral striatum and the substantia nigra. The striatum and the substantia nigra project to the medial dorsal thalamus.86 Finally, all the information is sent back to the inductive cingulate grey via the thalamus. It is not clear whether there is a direct or indirect connection between the ACC and the striatum. Yet, there is prove that the connections betwixt the ventral striatum and thalamic neurons are nowadays.93 The nucleus accumbens is a part of the ventral striatum, which receives excitatory inputs from the ACC and outputs to the thalamus, and has been linked with anhedonia. The relationship between the nucleus accumbens and the thalamus is negatively correlated with the severity of low94 and is related to emotional regulation and motivational function.95 Functional connectivity studies revealed the coordination between the ventral striatum, the bilateral middle temporal lobe (amygdala and hippocampus), and the ventral midbrain (substantia nigra).54 According to previous findings, the ACC plays an important role in anhedonic symptoms in patients with MDD.90 Therefore, impairment to the inductive cingulate circuitry may exist negatively correlated with the severity of depressive symptoms.
Different circuits besides take correlations. As mentioned earlier, the functional connectivity of the ACC and the DLPFC is increased. This indicates an increase in the sensitivity to constructive disharmonize.35 A correlation between the OFC and the ACC has too been mentioned. The causal interaction between the OFC and the ACC is positively related to the severity of depression.20 The ACC receives input from the PFC and outputs to other encephalon regions.96 A powerless DLPFC and OFC in MDD consequence in a failure to activate the ACC, ultimately leading to excursion impairment.
3.2. Prefrontal‐hippocampal circuit
In the early stage of MDD, a DTI study reported that the prefrontal‐hippocampal circuits,13 which originate from the fornix and output fibers to the hippocampus, projection to the mammillary bodies, the anterior nuclei of the thalamus, and finally dorsum to the prefrontal cortex. A lower FA value was observed in the fornix and the hippocampal cingulum17 of depressive patients. The fornix comprises the major fibers that track through the hippocampus, and it is related to the reduction in the hippocampal volume.97 Disruptions in the fornix would result in barriers to the transmission of information between the PFC and the hippocampus. Resting‐state functional research found decreased functional connectivity amongst the bilateral hippocampus, the DLPFC, and the ventral PFC17 in MDD patients, which might bespeak emotional and cerebral dysfunction in MDD. There was a significant correlation betwixt the white affair integrity of the fornix and the functional connectivity of the PFC‐hippocampal circuit in salubrious controls, but this was found to exist impaired in the MDD patients.17 In conclusion, prefrontal hippocampal structural damage can explain the deficits in attention, information processing, and autobiographical retention in depressive patients.17
iii.3. Frontothalamic circuit
To our knowledge, Professor Jia and his team are the get-go ones to find and put forrad the "suicide loop"six (Figure4). That particular DTI study institute that the FA value of the left internal capsule was lower in patients who attempted suicide.i Abnormalities in the cobweb connections passing through the left anterior limb of the internal capsule that projects to the left middle frontal cortex and the OFC and finally posteriorly to the left thalamus in MDD patients who committed suicide were establish to be more than severe than those who did non commit suicide and controls. The eye frontal cortex and the OFC are related to decision making and problem solving and can touch modulation,49, 98 and the thalamus is involved in the mood‐related neural network.49 These three regions are considered hub nodes of encephalon connections.21 Changes in the frontal and thalamic circulation may lead to cerebral and emotional changes, thereby increasing the vulnerability to suicidal behavior in patients with depression. The results demonstrating these white affair changes are consequent with those of other studies.99, 100 Abnormal gray matter in the temporal and parietal lobes was also institute in the patients who committed suicide. Decreased gray matter volume in the limbic cingulate gyrus and the right heart temporal gyrus and increased gray matter volume in the right parietal lobe101 were reported, and a negative correlation was observed between the limbic cingulate gyrus and dysfunctional attitude scores. The attitude score reflects the perception of oneself and the world,102 and cognitive distortions ofttimes pb to negative beliefs and behaviors, such as suicide. The reduction in the magnetization transfer ratio in the left inferior parietal lobule and the right superior parietal lobule in patients who attempted suicide was consistent with previous findings.103 Determination‐making barriers are associated with suicidal behavior.68 Thus, the alterations in the parietal lobule may pb to suicidal behaviors. In addition, the hippocampus and the angular gyrus are the biological markers for MDD, but lilliputian is known about the relationship between the book of these regions and suicide attempters. An interesting finding reported that suicide attempters have reduced gray matter volume in the hippocampus104 and in the left athwart gyrus,98 especially in cases of acute suicide. It was also constitute that the total volume of the hippocampal threshold of v cm3 had a negative predictive value of 98.2% for acute suicide attempts.104 The angular gyrus is known to be part of the default‐manner network, and impairments in this region in patients are associated with negative thoughts nearly the future or themselves.98 Disruptions in the angular gyrus may lead to suicidal behaviors or may increase the chance of suicide.
Suicide excursion. MDD patients who committed suicide were found to have abnormal connections among the left anterior limb of the internal sheathing, the left heart frontal cortex, the orbital prefrontal cortex, and the left thalamus. IC, internal capsule; L, left; MDD, major depressive disorder; MFC, middle frontal cortex; OFC, orbitofrontal prefrontal cortex; THA, thalamus
iv. Determination AND FUTURE Management
In vivo MRI scans have made groovy achievements in the study of psychiatric disorders, which have resulted in the dawn of the agreement of the pathophysiology of psychosis, especially of MDD. Many brain region alterations have been reported, and some crucial circuits accept likewise been revealed via imaging studies. The discovery of brain network put forward new ideas in the understanding of the disease of depression, providing constructive stimulation sites and efficacy evaluations for the commonly used transcranial magnetic stimulation or deep brain stimulation techniques. In add-on, these findings also suggest that MDD is not only due to local lesions but is also a multiloop disorder. Yet, previous studies still had limitations, and more research is needed in the future. First, about of the studies mentioned small sample sizes, which could have increased the simulated‐positive and (or) false‐negative rates of the results. Therefore, multicenter cooperation not only would solve this problem of sample content but too could effect in more in‐depth research. Second, the identification of significant lesions relies on long‐term follow‐ups and the comparison of treated and nontreated patients. Time to come studies need to behave longitudinal studies with larger samples. Moreover, using animal experiments to verify the neuroimaging findings and applying the results to humans is very of import and volition be a big pace in the application of neuroimaging to the clinical field.
Disharmonize OF Involvement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the National Natural Scientific discipline Foundation (Grant Nos. 81771812, 81621003, 81571637, and 81271532), and the Plan for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Academy (PCSIRT, Grant No. IRT16R52) of Cathay. Q.Thou. received the back up of Changjiang Scholar Professorship Award (Award No. T2014190) of Cathay and the CMB Distinguished Professorship Award (Award No. F510000/G16916411) administered by the Institute of International Education, USA.
Notes
Zhang F‐F, Peng Westward, Sweeney JA, Jia Z‐Y, Gong Q‐Y. Brain structure alterations in depression: Psychoradiological show. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24:994–1003. 10.1111/cns.12835 [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Correspondent Information
Zhi‐Yun Jia, Email: moc.liamtoh@aijnuyihz.
Qi‐Yong Gong, Email: nc.gro.crrmh@gnoggnoyiq.
REFERENCES
1. Jia ZY, Huang XQ, Wu QZ, et al. High‐field magnetic resonance imaging of suicidality in patients with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:1381‐1390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Kong 50, Wu F, Tang Y, et al. Frontal‐subcortical volumetric deficits in single episode, medication‐naive depressed patients and the furnishings of 8 weeks fluoxetine treatment: a VBM‐DARTEL report. PLoS I. 2014;9:e79055. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
three. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. JAMA. 2003;289:3095‐3105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Eijndhoven P, Wingen GV, Katzenbauer M, et al. Paralimbic cortical thickness in first‐episode depression: show for trait‐related differences in mood regulation. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1477‐1486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
five. Peng West, Cheng ZQ, Yin L, Jia ZY, Gong QY. Essential brain structural alterations in major depressive disorder: a voxel‐wise meta‐analysis on first episode, medication‐naive patients. J Bear on Disord. 2016;199:114‐123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Jia Z, Wang Y, Huang 10, et al. Dumb frontothalamic circuitry in suicidal patients with low revealed by improvidence tensor imaging at three.0 T. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39:170‐177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
seven. Yang XH, Wang Y, Wang DF, et al. White affair microstructural abnormalities and their association with anticipatory anhedonia in depression. Psychiatry Res. 2017;264:29‐34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Srivastava Due south, Bhatia MS, Bhargava SK, Kumari R, Chandra S. A diffusion tensor imaging study using a voxel‐based assay, region‐of‐involvement method to analyze white thing abnormalities in outset‐episode, treatment‐naive major depressive disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;28:131‐137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ix. Chen One thousand, Guo Y, Zhu H, et al. Intrinsic disruption of white affair microarchitecture in first‐episode, drug‐naive major depressive disorder: a voxel‐based meta‐analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017;76:179‐187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Wei South, Geng H, Jiang X, et al. Amygdala‐prefrontal cortex resting‐state functional connectivity varies with offset depressive or manic episode in bipolar disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2017;641:51‐55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xi. Shen Z, Jiang L, Yang S, et al. Identify changes of encephalon regional homogeneity in early and after adult onset patients with beginning‐episode depression using resting‐state fMRI. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184712. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Huang Grand, Lu S, Yu L, et al. Altered partial amplitude of low frequency fluctuation associated with cognitive dysfunction in beginning‐episode drug‐naive major depressive disorder patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Zhong X, Pu W, Yao S. Functional alterations of fronto‐limbic circuit and default fashion network systems in first‐episode, drug‐naive patients with major depressive disorder: a meta‐analysis of resting‐country fMRI data. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:280‐286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Rich‐club organization of the human connectome. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15775‐15786. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Bonelli RM, Cummings JL. Frontal‐subcortical circuitry and behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;nine:141‐151. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Wang W, Zhao Y, Hu X, et al. Conjoint and dissociated structural and functional abnormalities in get-go‐episode drug‐naive patients with major depressive disorder: a multimodal meta‐analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Geng H, Wu F, Kong 50, et al. Disrupted structural and functional connectivity in prefrontal‐hippocampus circuitry in first‐episode medication‐naive adolescent depression. PLoS 1. 2016;11:e0148345. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xviii. Yeh PH, Zhu H, Nicoletti MA, Hatch JP, Brambilla P, Soares JC. Structural equation modeling and master component analysis of gray affair volumes in major depressive and bipolar disorders: differences in latent volumetric structure. Psychiatry Res. 2010;184:177‐185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xix. Yi S. 3D MRI studies of neuroanatomic changes in unipolar major depression: the role of stress and medical comorbidity. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:791‐800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Gao Q, Zou Chiliad, He ZL, Sun XL, Chen HF. Causal connectivity alterations of cortical‐subcortical circuit anchored on reduced hemodynamic response encephalon regions in showtime‐episode drug‐naïve major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21861. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Qin J, Liu H, Wei Thou, et al. Reconfiguration of hub‐level community structure in depressions: a follow‐up report via diffusion tensor imaging. J Bear upon Disord. 2017;207:305‐312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Qin J, Wei M, Liu H, et al. Abnormal hubs of white affair networks in the frontal‐parieto circuit contribute to depression discrimination via pattern nomenclature. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:1314‐1320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Bora E, Fornito A, Pantelis C, Yücel M. Gray thing abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta‐assay of voxel based morphometry studies. J Affect Disord. 2012;138:9‐18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Lai CH. Hippocampal and subcortical alterations of start‐episode, medication naïve major depressive disorder with panic disorder patients. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014;26:142‐149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Serra‐Blasco M, Portella MJ, Gómez‐Ansón B, et al. Effects of disease duration and treatment resistance on grey matter abnormalities in major depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:434‐440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Ramezani K, Abolmaesumi P, Tahmaseb A, et al. Fusion assay of first episode low: where brain shape deformations meet local composition of tissue. NeuroImage. 2015;vii:114‐121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Mayberg HS, Brannan Southward, Mahurin RK, et al. Cingulate office in low: a potential predictor of treatment response. NeuroReport. 1997;8:1057‐1061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Zhang TJ, Wu Q‐Z, Huang XQ, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging reveals the brain deficit in patients with treatment‐refractory low. J Impact Disord. 2009;117:157‐161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Cano 1000, Martínez‐Zalacaín I, Bernabéu‐Sanz Á, et al. Encephalon volumetric and metabolic correlates of electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant depression: a longitudinal neuroimaging written report. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;seven:e1023. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Liu XD, Kakeda S, Watanabe M, et al. Relationship betwixt the cortical thickness and serum cortisol levels in drug‐naive, first‐episode patients with major depressive disorder: a Surface‐based Morphometric Report. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32:702‐708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Ajilorea O, Narr 1000, Rosenthal J, et al. Regional cortical gray matter thickness differences associated with type 2 diabetes and major low. Psychiatry Res. 2010;184:63‐70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Foland‐Ross LC, Sacchet MD, Prasad G, Gilbert B, Thompson PM, Gotlib IH. Cortical thickness predicts the first onset of major depression in adolescence. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015;46:125‐131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Yang XH, Wang Y, Huang J, et al. Increased prefrontal and parietal cortical thickness does not correlate with anhedonia in patients with untreated kickoff‐episode major depressive disorders. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;234:144‐151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Phillips JL, Batten LA, Tremblay P, Aldosary F, Blier P. A prospective, longitudinal study of the effect of remission on cortical thickness and hippocampal volume in patients with treatment‐resistant low. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18:i‐ix. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Lu Q, Li H, Luo G, et al. Dumb prefrontal‐amygdala effective connectivity is responsible for the dysfunction of emotion process in major depressive disorder: a dynamic causal modeling study on 1000000. Neurosci Lett. 2012;523:125‐130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Milad MR, Rauch SL. The office of the orbitofrontal cortex in anxiety disorders. Ann Due north Y Acad Sci. 2007;1121:546‐561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Zhao K, Liu H, Yan R, et al. Contradistinct patterns of association between cortical thickness and subcortical book in patients with start episode major depressive disorder: a structural MRI study. Psychiatry Res. 2017;260:sixteen‐22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Zhang X, Di X, Lei H, et al. Imbalanced spontaneous brain activity in orbitofrontal‐insular circuits in individuals with cognitive vulnerability to depression. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:56‐63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Shen Z, Cheng Y, Yang Due south, et al. Changes of grey matter volume in first‐episode drug‐naive adult major depressive disorder patients with unlike historic period‐onset. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:492‐498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xl. Wang Y, Jia Y, Xu K, Ling X, Liu S, Huang L. Frontal white matter biochemical abnormalities in first‐episode, treatment‐naive patients with major depressive disorder: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:620‐626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Cole J, Costafreda SG, McGuffin P, Fu CH. Hippocampal atrophy in first episode depression: a meta‐analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:483‐487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Zhang X, Yao Due south, Zhu Ten, Wang X, Zhu X, Zhong M. Gray affair volume abnormalities in individuals with cognitive vulnerability to depression: a voxel‐based morphometry written report. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:443‐452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Choi KS, Riva‐Posse P, Gross RE, Mayberg HS. Mapping the 'Depression Switch' during Intraoperative testing of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1252‐1260. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Fettes P, Schulze 50, Downar J. Cortico‐striatal‐thalamic loop circuits of the orbitofrontal cortex: promising therapeutic targets in psychiatric illness. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017;11:25. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Lan MJ, Chhetry BT, Liston C, Mann JJ, Dubin M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces brain morphological changes in regions associated with a treatment resistant major depressive episode: an exploratory analysis. Brain Stimul. 2016;ix:577‐583. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Taber KH, Wen C, Khan A, Hurley RA. The limbic thalamus. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16:127‐132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Tekin Southward, Cummings JL. Frontal‐subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry an update. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:647‐654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Lu Y, Liang H, Han D, et al. The volumetric and shape changes of the putamen and thalamus in offset episode, untreated major depressive disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;11:658‐666. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Zhao YJ, Du MY, Huang XQ, et al. Brain grey affair abnormalities in medication‐free patients with major depressive disorder: a meta‐analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44:2927‐2937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Zhang H, Li L, Wu Thousand, et al. Encephalon gray thing alterations in get-go episodes of depression: a meta‐assay of whole‐encephalon studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;60:43‐fifty. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Zhao Grand, Liang H, Yan R, et al. Altered patterns of clan between cortical thickness and subcortical volume in patients with first episode major depressive disorder: a structural MRI report. Psychiatry Res. 2017;260:sixteen‐22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Kinoshita M, Nakada M, Okita H, Hamada J, Hayashi Y. Predictive value of fractional anisotropy of the arcuate fasciculus for the functional recovery of language after brain tumor resection: a preliminary study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;117:45‐50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Chapman CH, Nazem‐Zadeh Thousand, Lee OE, et al. Regional variation in brain white matter diffusion alphabetize changes following chemoradiotherapy: a prospective written report using tract‐based spatial statistics. PLoS I. 2013;8:e57768. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Postuma RB, Dagher A. Basal ganglia functional connectivity based on a meta‐analysis of 126 positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging publications. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:1508‐1521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Jacobs RH, Barba A, Gowins JR, et al. Decoupling of the amygdala to other salience network regions in boyish‐onset recurrent major depressive disorder. Psychol Med. 2016;46:1055‐1067. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Dombrovski AY, Siegle GJ, Szanto K, Clark L, Reynolds CF, Aizenstein H. The temptation of suicide: striatal greyness matter, discounting of delayed rewards, and suicide attempts in late‐life depression. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1203‐1215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Forbes EE, Hariri AR, Martin SL, et al. Contradistinct striatal activation predicting existent‐world positive affect in adolescent major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:64‐73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Satterthwaite TD, Kable JW, Vandekar 50, et al. Common and dissociable dysfunction of the advantage organization in bipolar and unipolar depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2258‐2268. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Koolschijn PCMP, van Haren NEM, Lensvelt‐Mulders GJLM, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. Reduced volume of limbic system–affiliated basal ganglia in mood disorders: a meta‐assay of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Encephalon Mapp. 1999;30:3719‐3735. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Koolschijn PC, van Haren NE, Lensvelt‐Mulders GJ, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. Encephalon volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta‐analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Encephalon Mapp. 2009;thirty:3719‐3735. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Schmaal L, Veltman DJ, van Erp TG, et al. Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:806‐812. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Stratmann Grand, Konrad C, Kugel H, et al. Insular and hippocampal greyness matter volume reductions in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102692. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Johnston BA, Steele JD, Tolomeo S, Christmas D, Matthews K. Structural MRI‐based predictions in patients with treatment‐refractory depression (TRD). PLoS ONE. 2015;ten:e0132958. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Nestler EJ, Carlezon WA. The mesolimbic dopamine advantage circuit in depression. Biol Psychiat. 2006;59:1151‐1159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Wagner Thou, Koch Thou, Schachtzabel C, Schultz CC, Sauer H, Schlösser RG. Structural brain alterations in patients with major depressive disorder and loftier adventure for suicide: show for a distinct neurobiological entity? NeuroImage. 2011;54:1607‐1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Liu X, Kakeda South, Watanabe K, et al. Human relationship betwixt the cortical thickness and serum cortisol levels in drug‐naive, first‐episode patients with major depressive disorder: a surface‐based morphometric study. Depress Feet. 2015;32:702‐708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Yang XH, Wang Y, Huang J, et al. Increased prefrontal and parietal cortical thickness does not correlate with anhedonia in patients with untreated first‐episode major depressive disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2015;234:144‐151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Chen Z, Peng W, Dominicus H, et al. High‐field magnetic resonance imaging of structural alterations in first‐episode, drug‐naive patients with major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;half dozen:e942. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
seventy. Liang MJ, Zhou Q, Yang KR, et al. Identify changes of brain regional homogeneity in bipolar disorder and unipolar depression using resting‐state FMRI. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79999. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Grafton ST, Mazziotta J, Presty Southward, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Phelps ME. Functional anatomy of human being procedural learning adamant with regional cerebral blood flow and PET. J Neurosci. 1992;12:2542‐2548. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Campbell S, Macqueen G. The function of the hippocampus in the pathophysiology of major depression. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2004;29:417‐426. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Ballmaier 1000, Narr KL, Toga AW, et al. Hippocampal morphology and distinguishing late‐onset from early‐onset elderly depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:229‐237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Geerlings MI, Gerritsen 50. Late‐life depression, hippocampal volumes, and hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal centrality regulation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:339‐350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Campbell S, Marriott M, Nahmias C, MacQueen GM. Lower hippocampal volume in patients suffering from depression: a meta‐analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:598‐607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Frodl T, O'Keane Five. How does the brain bargain with cumulative stress? A review with focus on developmental stress, HPA centrality function and hippocampal construction in humans. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;52:24‐37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Yi JH, Brown C, Whitehead One thousand, et al. Glucocorticoids actuate a synapse weakening pathway culminating in tau phosphorylation in the hippocampus. Pharmacol Res. 2017;121:42‐51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Fu CH, Williams Southward, Cleare AJ, et al. Attenuation of the neural response to pitiful faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:877‐889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Tendolkar I, Mv B, Oostrom I, et al. Electroconvulsive therapy increases hippocampal and amygdala book in therapy refractory depression: a longitudinal pilot report. Psychiatry Res. 2013;214:197‐203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eighty. Eker C, Gonul Equally. Volumetric MRI studies of the hippocampus in major depressive disorder: meanings of inconsistency and directions for future research. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010;11:nineteen‐35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Colla Yard, Kronenberg Grand, Deuschle Yard, et al. Hippocampal volume reduction and HPA‐arrangement activity in major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41:553‐560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Shena T, Qiu M, Li C, et al. Altered spontaneous neural activeness in first‐episode, unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder. NeuroReport. 2014;25:1302‐1307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Marchand WR. Cortico‐basal ganglia circuitry: a review of fundamental research and implications for functional connectivity studies of mood and anxiety disorders. Encephalon Struct Funct. 2010;215:73‐96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel arrangement of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:357‐381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Cummings JL. Frontal‐subcortical circuits and man behavior. Curvation Neurol. 1993;fifty:873‐880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Elliott R, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: bear witness from human neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:308‐317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Jarbo K, Verstynen TD. Converging structural and functional connectivity of orbitofrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior parietal cortex in the man striatum. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3865‐3878. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88. Zald DH, McHugo M, Ray KL, Glahn DC, Eickhoff SB, Laird AR. Meta‐analytic connectivity modeling reveals differential functional connectivity of the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:232‐248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. Cavada C, Compañy T, Tejedor J, Cruz‐Rizzolo RJ, Reinoso‐Suárez F. The anatomical connections of the macaque monkey orbitofrontal cortex. A review. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:220‐242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xc. Segarra N, Metastasio A, Ziauddeen H, et al. Aberrant frontostriatal action during unexpected advantage receipt in depression and schizophrenia: relationship to anhedonia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:2001‐2010. [PMC costless commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. McCabe C, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. Neural representation of reward in recovered depressed patients. Psychopharmacology. 2009;205:667‐677. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92. Wegener I, Geiser F, Alfter Due south, et al. Changes of explicitly and implicitly measured cocky‐esteem in the treatment of major depression: evidence for implicit self‐esteem compensation. Compr Psychiatry. 2015;58:57‐67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, DeLong MR. Basal ganglia‐thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:119‐146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Zhu X, Helpman 50, Papini S, et al. Contradistinct resting state functional connectivity of fright and reward circuitry in comorbid PTSD and major depression. Depress Feet. 2017;34:641‐650. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Haber SN, Calzavara R. The cortico‐basal ganglia integrative network: the part of the thalamus. Encephalon Res Balderdash. 2009;78:69‐74. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Davidson RJ, Pizzagalli D, Nitschke JB, Putnam K. Depression: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:545‐574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Davidson CA, Kuroki N, Alvarado JL, Niznikiewicz MA, McCarley RW, Levitt JJ. An MRI written report of septi pellucidi in relation to hippocampus book and fornix integrity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;134:165‐170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Lee YJ, Kim S, Gwak AR, et al. Decreased regional gray matter book in suicide attempters compared to suicide not‐attempters with major depressive disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2016;67:59‐65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. Taylor WD, Boyd B, McQuoid DR, Kudra Grand, Saleh A, MacFall JR. Widespread white affair but focal gray matter alterations in depressed individuals with thoughts of death. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015;62:22‐28. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Sachs‐Ericsson N, Hames JL, Joiner TE, et al. Differences between suicide attempters and non‐attempters in depressed older patients: depression severity, white matter lesions, and cognitive performance. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22:75‐85. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Peng HJ, Wu K, Li J, et al. Increased suicide attempts in young depressed patients with aberrant temporal–parietal–limbic gray matter volume. J Affect Disord. 2014;165:69‐73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Lai CH, Wu YT. The grey matter alterations in major depressive disorder and panic disorder: putative differences in the pathogenesis. J Affect Disord. 2015;186:one‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103. Chen Z, Zhang H, Jia Z, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging of suicidal patients with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9670. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104. Colle R, Chuoin M, Cur C, et al. Depressed suicide attempters have smaller hippocampus than depressed patients without suicide attempts. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;61:13‐xviii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6489983/
0 Response to "what have researchers found to be the most common biological cause of paraphilias?"
Post a Comment